RyanVM.net Discussion Board Forum Index RyanVM.net Discussion Board

 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

XPSP3_QFE_UpdatePack for Windows XP Post-SP3 20140812
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 16, 17, 18 ... 45, 46, 47  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    RyanVM.net Discussion Board Forum Index -> Community Update Packs -> Windows XP Professional
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
5eraph
Moderator


Joined: 05 Jul 2005
Posts: 3899
Location: Riverview, MI USA

PostPosted: Sun May 16, 2010 7:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

adric wrote:
Yes, I see the url in the module and it is valid. vshell32.dll on the other hand doesn't seem to be a part of windows though.
The mrt from code65536 has a different url, but it works - no vshell32.dll in it so it isn't the same file.

Agreed. vshell32.dll appears to be a file included in "Alky for Applications," which is not a part of Windows. (It's not even a Microsoft file. It was created by Cody Brocious for the Alky Project.) code65536's stub should be used, which, as you've stated, does not have a dependency on a non-Microsoft file. Smile


Last edited by 5eraph on Sun May 16, 2010 7:28 am
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
user_hidden



Joined: 06 Dec 2007
Posts: 1757
Location: Canada eh!

PostPosted: Sun May 16, 2010 7:27 am    Post subject: Re: KB890830 (MRT) Reply with quote

adric wrote:
I was just comparing the mrt.exe that gets installed with the updatepack and the mrt.exe that gets created via WU and I see
a huge size difference in the two. 8704 vs. 32058312. If I run the smaller .exe, it throws up an error about vShell32.dll not found.

Are there some additional steps needed so mrt.exe will work?

Up to now I've always copied it from another system and forgot to ask about it here.

Al


the MRT.exe in the pack is a stubbed version to save space.
it will launch a website to download the update if you want to.
the link works perfectly as i test it before i stub the version every patch tuesday, and just tested it now.

when i originally made it i think it is a mix of Code65536 and Yumeyao.
here is the thread that has the info.

http://www.ryanvm.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=4852
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
5eraph
Moderator


Joined: 05 Jul 2005
Posts: 3899
Location: Riverview, MI USA

PostPosted: Sun May 16, 2010 7:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Your stubbed file requires a non-Microsoft file, which is not included in your update pack, user_hidden. code's file should still be used.

Test without the sidebar addon, or anything that installs Alky for Applications. Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
user_hidden



Joined: 06 Dec 2007
Posts: 1757
Location: Canada eh!

PostPosted: Sun May 16, 2010 5:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

5eraph wrote:
Your stubbed file requires a non-Microsoft file, which is not included in your update pack, user_hidden. code's file should still be used.

Test without the sidebar addon, or anything that installs Alky for Applications. Wink



now i get it Embarassed

already rebuilt a new mrt.exe for next release.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
vioplujjnsjzfg



Joined: 07 Jul 2008
Posts: 111

PostPosted: Mon May 17, 2010 10:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks for all the hard work.

Are you planning on making a new release soon with:

Fixed Descriptions & Installed By entries
Fixed Mrt.exe
Added Microsoft Update Catalog Web Control v7.4.7057.223

or waiting a month for the next patch Tuesday?

Thanks again.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
user_hidden



Joined: 06 Dec 2007
Posts: 1757
Location: Canada eh!

PostPosted: Mon May 17, 2010 11:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

vioplujjnsjzfg wrote:
Thanks for all the hard work.

Are you planning on making a new release soon with:

Fixed Descriptions & Installed By entries
Fixed Mrt.exe
Added Microsoft Update Catalog Web Control v7.4.7057.223

or waiting a month for the next patch Tuesday?

Thanks again.


yup will be released this afternoon.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
user_hidden



Joined: 06 Dec 2007
Posts: 1757
Location: Canada eh!

PostPosted: Mon May 17, 2010 12:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

updated 20100516 ....

1.28:
added Microsoft Update Catalog Web Control 7.4.7057.223
updated Mrt.exe stubbed version
updated code in updatepack inf files
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Outbreaker



Joined: 21 Aug 2007
Posts: 604

PostPosted: Mon May 17, 2010 12:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

nice thx
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
shiner



Joined: 08 Nov 2009
Posts: 642
Location: SE Asia

PostPosted: Mon May 17, 2010 6:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes, thanks once again.
_________________
"You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
newsposter



Joined: 14 Sep 2005
Posts: 1131

PostPosted: Mon May 17, 2010 7:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

tested in a few VMs, seems to work ok, qfecheck verbose comes up clean and as expected.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Outbreaker



Joined: 21 Aug 2007
Posts: 604

PostPosted: Mon May 17, 2010 10:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

In "Add/Remove Windows Components" i have a ernty "Windows XP PRO Specific" why is this in there ?

entries.ini has also this entry that points to a version.inf file that is not in the Update Pack:
VersionSpecific=ocgen.dll,OcEntry,version.inf,HIDE,7
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
5eraph
Moderator


Joined: 05 Jul 2005
Posts: 3899
Location: Riverview, MI USA

PostPosted: Tue May 18, 2010 1:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

This is strictly a cosmetic issue. It's there because the [Optional Components] sections of the files xphome.inf and xppro.inf do not match what's given in entries.ini. The text in white in the code samples below should all match.

entries.ini
Code:
VersionSpecific=ocgen.dll,OcEntry,version.inf,HIDE,7

xphome.inf and xppro.inf
Code:
[Optional Components]
ProdVersion

[ProdVersion]

The easiest way to fix it would be to change VersionSpecific in entries.ini to ProdVersion.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Outbreaker



Joined: 21 Aug 2007
Posts: 604

PostPosted: Tue May 18, 2010 2:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

THX this works but i have see now also that the xphome.inf and xppro.inf have all ProdVersion in the [Optional Components] section Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
5eraph
Moderator


Joined: 05 Jul 2005
Posts: 3899
Location: Riverview, MI USA

PostPosted: Tue May 18, 2010 3:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Correct. That's why the fix works.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
soporific



Joined: 13 Aug 2007
Posts: 47

PostPosted: Tue May 18, 2010 10:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

yay, a new release ... i SOOOOOO rely on this pack as the foundation for my unattended DVDs for both Home and work ... please please keep up the fantastic work Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
acus



Joined: 19 May 2010
Posts: 88
Location: italy

PostPosted: Thu May 20, 2010 12:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi user_hidden,

first of all, I want to thank for your work.
I made a comparison between your pack and this french pack (http://www.forum-unattend.fr/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=80).

I notice that in section [txtsetup_dirs] of the file entries.ini, there are two missing lines:

726 = system32\mui\041b

728 = system32\mui\0424

I notice, also, in svcpack folder that the french pack contains some hotfixes that are not present in your pack.

KB817688
KB889320-v2
KB897571
KB915800-v4
KB927436-v2
KB934401
KB940159-v2
KB945060-v3
KB945184
KB945436
KB948277
KB948698
KB948877-v2
KB950305-v2
KB950820
KB950982
KB951159
KB951347
KB951822-v2
kb952013
KB952117-v2
KB952595-v3
KB952909-v2
KB953930
KB954434
KB955043-v2
KB957218
KB957495
KB957502
KB958071
KB958259-v2
KB958910
KB959085
KB959160
KB959540
KB959554
KB959682
KB959765
KB959873
KB960519
KB960655
KB960921
KB960970
KB961067
KB961853-v2
KB963038
KB965220
KB967705-v2
KB968764
KB969262
KB969395
KB969632
KB970048
KB970063
KB970326
KB970413
KB970685
KB970922
KB971276
KB971323
KB971455
kb972187
KB973039
KB975167


Best regards
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
user_hidden



Joined: 06 Dec 2007
Posts: 1757
Location: Canada eh!

PostPosted: Thu May 20, 2010 2:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

acus wrote:
Hi user_hidden,

first of all, I want to thank for your work.
I made a comparison between your pack and this french pack (http://www.forum-unattend.fr/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=80).

I notice that in section [txtsetup_dirs] of the file entries.ini, there are two missing lines:



looks like a french translation of my pack Shocked

as for the extras i have no reason to even download and check that pack.
mine is 100% up to date!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
vodacuza



Joined: 22 Jan 2010
Posts: 267
Location: Romania

PostPosted: Thu May 20, 2010 3:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

                user_hidden wrote:
                Shocked
nice the reaction...

maybe the french pack maker forgot to operate the replacements between the various releases of the same target update each time

or they rushed in to include all "artistic" updates MS excremented among the high priority ones... Smile

usually the updates for the other languages are equal or even less than the english ones...

there are many updates...not all of them essential...some attend specific irrelevant situations
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Outbreaker



Joined: 21 Aug 2007
Posts: 604

PostPosted: Fri May 21, 2010 12:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Should this not be set to 0x10001,1 in the Update Pack ?
HKLM,"SOFTWARE\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\DeviceInstall\Settings","SuppressNewHWUI",0x10001,0
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
user_hidden



Joined: 06 Dec 2007
Posts: 1757
Location: Canada eh!

PostPosted: Fri May 21, 2010 6:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Outbreaker wrote:
Should this not be set to 0x10001,1 in the Update Pack ?
HKLM,"SOFTWARE\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\DeviceInstall\Settings","SuppressNewHWUI",0x10001,0



according to KB938596 if set to 1 all UI plug & play messages would be suppressed.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
5eraph
Moderator


Joined: 05 Jul 2005
Posts: 3899
Location: Riverview, MI USA

PostPosted: Fri May 21, 2010 7:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

In my opinion, where existing functionality is significantly changed, it is best not to enable the change by default. I believe user_hidden has taken the correct course of action concerning KB938596. Should a user wish to enable the change, they are welcome to do so in their own source by simply adding a registry entry. Smile

I have done the same in my own pack with this update, and also with KB971029 and KB977377. Additionally, I've made note of these in my changelog so users know what to expect.

What one person may see as a new feature another may see as a bug, depending on point of view.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
compstuff



Joined: 11 Aug 2006
Posts: 423
Location: Florida

PostPosted: Sun May 23, 2010 10:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Just wanted to say THANKS!!! Wouldn't know what to do without you and you're awesome work!!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mr_smartepants



Joined: 18 May 2006
Posts: 824
Location: Cambridgeshire, UK

PostPosted: Sun May 23, 2010 11:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Indeed. Thank you very much for all the personal time & effort you spend to make our lives easier.
_________________

Some heroes don't wear capes, they wear Kevlar and dog-tags!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
user_hidden



Joined: 06 Dec 2007
Posts: 1757
Location: Canada eh!

PostPosted: Tue May 25, 2010 8:31 pm    Post subject: Re: XPSP3_QFE_UpdatePack for Windows XP Post-SP3 1.2.9 20100525 Reply with quote

updated 1.2.9 20100525 ....


1.29:
updated KB931125 Root Certificates Update May 2010
added KB981793 replaced KB982615
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
fuksen



Joined: 09 Nov 2009
Posts: 1

PostPosted: Wed May 26, 2010 12:30 am    Post subject: Re: XPSP3_QFE_UpdatePack for Windows XP Post-SP3 1.2.9 20100525 Reply with quote

user_hidden wrote:
updated 1.2.9 20100525 ....


1.29:
updated KB931125 Root Certificates Update May 2010
added KB981793 replaced KB982615


got this error
---------------------------
Error!
---------------------------
H-The process cannot access the file 'D:\Portable\nLite-1.4.9.1\xxx\SVCPACK.INF' because it is being used by another process.

Please report this error if it's unexpected.

Write your message in English and attach your 'Last Session.ini' if possible.
---------------------------
OK
---------------------------
thx bro nice job with update
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
5eraph
Moderator


Joined: 05 Jul 2005
Posts: 3899
Location: Riverview, MI USA

PostPosted: Wed May 26, 2010 11:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have received a report of the same error with my update pack in nLite 1.4.9.1. It happens intermittently to me with mine as well. I have not found the cause yet.

When it occurs with my update pack, nLite seems to quit in the middle of adding the CATs to SvcPack.inf. The break point is random. This appears to be a problem with nLite, not the update pack.

For now, I'd recommend starting with a clean source and integrating the latest service pack and update pack with the RyanVM Integrator. Then run nLite on the updated source for everything else.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
newsposter



Joined: 14 Sep 2005
Posts: 1131

PostPosted: Wed May 26, 2010 3:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

You can tell nlite itself to run at above-normal priority or adjust it on the fly in Task Manager.

For me, this seems to have solved the occasional problems of quitting while adding cats and building the actual ISO.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
5eraph
Moderator


Joined: 05 Jul 2005
Posts: 3899
Location: Riverview, MI USA

PostPosted: Wed May 26, 2010 5:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'll give that a try, newsposter. I hadn't thought of that. Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
vodacuza



Joined: 22 Jan 2010
Posts: 267
Location: Romania

PostPosted: Thu May 27, 2010 6:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

me had an error issue right after changing nlite processing priority to "above normal" ... in fact I remember that to be the only error issue with nlite that I ever encountered. i cannot say for certain it was for that ... but now i leave it as is and wait a few seconds more to finish
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
5eraph
Moderator


Joined: 05 Jul 2005
Posts: 3899
Location: Riverview, MI USA

PostPosted: Thu May 27, 2010 11:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Unfortunately, newsposter, this does not work for me with my update pack. But thanks for the suggestion.

I haven't had the time to test user_hidden's update pack; so I can't say if it experiences the same nLite error here, or whether your suggestion would work or not.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
AndyMutz



Joined: 15 Mar 2006
Posts: 20
Location: Earth

PostPosted: Fri May 28, 2010 5:40 pm    Post subject: Re: XPSP3_QFE_UpdatePack for Windows XP Post-SP3 1.2.9 20100525 Reply with quote

fuksen wrote:
H-The process cannot access the file 'D:\Portable\nLite-1.4.9.1\xxx\SVCPACK.INF' because it is being used by another process.


maybe a virus scanner running in the background? try to disable any on access antivirus protection and see if that helps.

-andy-
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
5eraph
Moderator


Joined: 05 Jul 2005
Posts: 3899
Location: Riverview, MI USA

PostPosted: Fri May 28, 2010 6:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

That's exactly the solution, AndyMutz. Kurt_Aust has just confirmed that disabling AV allows nLite to finish integrating my pack without errors. I can imagine it should work for this pack as well.

In our case, avast! AV was the culprit.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
AndyMutz



Joined: 15 Mar 2006
Posts: 20
Location: Earth

PostPosted: Sat May 29, 2010 3:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

yeah, i had the same problem once with kaspersky antivirus.. sometimes got the "access denied, file in use" message while creating audio files with foobar2000 and the file being worked on was small and was accessed quickly several times.

-andy-
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
keloo05



Joined: 26 Jun 2006
Posts: 266
Location: Romania, Timisoara

PostPosted: Sat May 29, 2010 6:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

5eraph wrote:
This is strictly a cosmetic issue. It's there because the [Optional Components] sections of the files xphome.inf and xppro.inf do not match what's given in entries.ini. The text in white in the code samples below should all match.

entries.ini
Code:
VersionSpecific=ocgen.dll,OcEntry,version.inf,HIDE,7

xphome.inf and xppro.inf
Code:
[Optional Components]
ProdVersion

[ProdVersion]

The easiest way to fix it would be to change VersionSpecific in entries.ini to ProdVersion.


I have a question for user_hidden before downloading the new updatepack (my bandwidth is limited now). Was this corrected in the new version, or you leave it on purpose?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
5eraph
Moderator


Joined: 05 Jul 2005
Posts: 3899
Location: Riverview, MI USA

PostPosted: Sat May 29, 2010 9:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

It is fixed in 1.2.9, keloo05.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
vodacuza



Joined: 22 Jan 2010
Posts: 267
Location: Romania

PostPosted: Sun May 30, 2010 10:43 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

the nowaday's civilization, the global crisis affecting human relations... Razz let's be less demanding and acusitory especially when u_h is doing us a favor and it is not hired by any, nor bound to react a certain way, to a demanding attitude, it is the least we can do to respect his passionate but free work Wink supposedly, those who might be really interested in this kind of forum, might also have an opened mind and a way of getting at the roots of the things in general, which means avoiding as much as possible to bring here the day by day anxiety. choosing the right manner of expressing ourselves makes us human, we can prove it more than others Razz
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
c400



Joined: 31 Jul 2006
Posts: 23

PostPosted: Sun May 30, 2010 7:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

great work! works as a charm
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
WiNmaKlIn



Joined: 27 May 2010
Posts: 1

PostPosted: Sun May 30, 2010 8:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi guys. This is my first post and I hope this question hasn't been asked elsewhere. I have downloaded the 'XPSP3_QFE_UpdatePack_1.2.8' version and then a few days later I saw that an update to this 'version 1.2.9' was posted. I am on dial-up so it takes a while to download a 40Mb file. My question is 'Is it possible to integrate the 1.2.9 change(s) into the 1.2.8 40Mb file so that I don't have to download the whole thing again?' Thanks.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
newsposter



Joined: 14 Sep 2005
Posts: 1131

PostPosted: Sun May 30, 2010 8:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

pack makers haven't made delta/changes-only packs.......
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
vodacuza



Joined: 22 Jan 2010
Posts: 267
Location: Romania

PostPosted: Mon Jun 07, 2010 3:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

why after installing office xp...even if i remove it ...the MU keeps saying there is a critical update available for windows ? ( KB975025 )
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
ChiefZeke



Joined: 23 Mar 2007
Posts: 696
Location: Victorville, California

PostPosted: Mon Jun 07, 2010 3:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

WiNmaKlIn wrote:
Hi guys. This is my first post and I hope this question hasn't been asked elsewhere. I have downloaded the 'XPSP3_QFE_UpdatePack_1.2.8' version and then a few days later I saw that an update to this 'version 1.2.9' was posted. I am on dial-up so it takes a while to download a 40Mb file. My question is 'Is it possible to integrate the 1.2.9 change(s) into the 1.2.8 40Mb file so that I don't have to download the whole thing again?' Thanks.

As tomorrow is patch Tuesday just wait till late tomorrow or early Wednesday and you'll be offered a new Update Pack.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
vodacuza



Joined: 22 Jan 2010
Posts: 267
Location: Romania

PostPosted: Tue Jun 08, 2010 8:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

till this split second Smile the only update is DirectX_June2010 , which strange enough cannot be detected by direct x online update tool, which makes me think that it is more a matter of comercial issue, a question of "cadence" releasing habit, rather than a critical update... but NOTHING for XP-OS or IE8 till now.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
newsposter



Joined: 14 Sep 2005
Posts: 1131

PostPosted: Tue Jun 08, 2010 11:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

There is a fine line between polite discussion and harassment......
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
vodacuza



Joined: 22 Jan 2010
Posts: 267
Location: Romania

PostPosted: Tue Jun 08, 2010 11:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

which of them replaces the other...cause the corresponding security bulletin fails the appropriate description Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
vodacuza



Joined: 22 Jan 2010
Posts: 267
Location: Romania

PostPosted: Tue Jun 08, 2010 12:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

they did it !
I have almost 10 updates ...some about IE and WMP also
MS never stops... Sad
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
user_hidden



Joined: 06 Dec 2007
Posts: 1757
Location: Canada eh!

PostPosted: Tue Jun 08, 2010 3:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

updated 20100608 .....

1.30
updated Microsoft Malicious Software Removal Tool Key to v3.8
added KB975562 replaced KB975560
added KB978695 replaced KB968816
added KB979482
added KB979559 replaced KB969947
added KB980195 replaced KB978262
added KB980218
added KB982381 replaced KB980182
added KB983458 replaced KB980232
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pdl808



Joined: 01 Dec 2007
Posts: 58
Location: Milpitas, CA USA

PostPosted: Tue Jun 08, 2010 5:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

v 1.30 fails the checksums
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
adric



Joined: 21 May 2007
Posts: 469

PostPosted: Tue Jun 08, 2010 5:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Same here. Downloaded from Mediafire link.

MD5
a89f7d61d9ee4be5f889772030dca3d0 *XPSP3_QFE_UpdatePack_1.3.0_20100608.7z

Al
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
RogueSpear



Joined: 23 Nov 2004
Posts: 1155
Location: Buffalo, NY

PostPosted: Tue Jun 08, 2010 5:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It does however pass 7-Zip test.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
shiner



Joined: 08 Nov 2009
Posts: 642
Location: SE Asia

PostPosted: Tue Jun 08, 2010 5:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Same here. I apparently got the same file as adric.
_________________
"You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    RyanVM.net Discussion Board Forum Index -> Community Update Packs -> Windows XP Professional All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 16, 17, 18 ... 45, 46, 47  Next
Page 17 of 47

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group