| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
jd976
Joined: 21 Apr 2007
Posts: 61
|
 Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2007 3:14 pm Post subject: [Updated].Net Framework All in One x86(incl 3.5SP1) 29/01/09 |
 |
|
For x86 only, tested on xp pro x86 only.
Includes .net 1.1 sp1, 2 sp2, 3 sp2, and 3.5 sp1 all patches applied.
Download: DotNetFx_All_In_1_Addon_v2.4.7z
MD5= D521F5F64D36D5B68728D44C849815FD
Size= 65mb approx
Note: Installing this addon during svcpack causes two errors in event viewer. I don't know how important they are because the installation completes successfully.
| Code: | Product: Microsoft .NET Framework 3.0 Service Pack 2 -- Error 2004.Method SHGetFolderPath failed. HRESULT: 0x80004005.
and
Product: Microsoft .NET Framework 3.0 Service Pack 2 -- Error 2004.Method GetFontCacheDataFolder failed. HRESULT: 0x80004005. |
No more standalone switchless. Unpack and use internal switchless.
Use RVMI or Nlite to apply, Windows Installer 3.1 or above required to install Net 3.5. Its included in Ryan's pack as well as other packs.
Changelog:
29/01/09:Added KB959209 without applying msp's to msi's, so windows update could detect it.
27/12/08:Added KB959209
13/08/08:Discontinued standalone switchless, removed nonno fabio's registry entries(no longer required). Rebuild from scratch with 3.5sp1 full installer.
30/03/2008: Added nonno fabio's registry entries to prevent KB932471 being displayed in windows update. Log files are now deleted after installation of svcpack addon.
Enjoy.
Last edited by jd976 on Sat Jan 31, 2009 9:43 pm |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
c400
Joined: 31 Jul 2006
Posts: 23
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2007 4:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| silent addon that installs from svcpack sounds great! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
bober101
Joined: 08 Feb 2007
Posts: 923
Location: canadia!
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
thx.
_________________
XP theme source patcher
patches/overwrites ure default xp visual resources |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
*Reaper*
Joined: 04 Feb 2006
Posts: 594
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2007 9:03 pm Post subject: Re: [Release].Net Framework All in One x86 |
|
|
| jd976 wrote: |
Note: Windows update may show that KB932471 is missing but fails to install. This is a mistake in Windows Update logic. Aaron Stebner's WebLog has a post related to this issue.
. |
Its funny how microsoft hasn't fixed this problem but RogueSpear has.... 
_________________
My Windows 7 Addons |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Outbreaker
Joined: 21 Aug 2007
Posts: 464
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 12:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | If wanted I can make a silent addon that installs from svcpack |
Its a good idea but if it makes errors in Log files the better not.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
bober101
Joined: 08 Feb 2007
Posts: 923
Location: canadia!
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 4:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i dont think this is svcpack compatible, i did a real install last night and net 2 and 3 failed to install.
_________________
XP theme source patcher
patches/overwrites ure default xp visual resources |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jd976
Joined: 21 Apr 2007
Posts: 61
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 5:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| bober101 wrote: | | i dont think this is svcpack compatible, i did a real install last night and net 2 and 3 failed to install. |
Which one did you use?
dotnetfxAIO.exe can't be used in svcpack. It's for install in windows.
DotNetFx_All_In_1_Addon_v2.7z does work in svcpack. With my tests on VM. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
bober101
Joined: 08 Feb 2007
Posts: 923
Location: canadia!
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 5:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
my bad i didint see u had 2 versions in ure post
_________________
XP theme source patcher
patches/overwrites ure default xp visual resources |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
V@no
Joined: 28 Dec 2006
Posts: 17
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2007 12:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thank you for this!
I just wonder, I once slipstreamed a silent installer .net all-in-one via nlite (added as an update), it went through, after windows install it showed all .net versions in add/remove programs, it looked fine.
But, every new update for .net would fail install via windows update...
and since very recently everyone keep saying that svcpack is not possible for .net...So, now I'm not sure if this is really works properly.
As an experiment, one could create all-in-one pack using your method, but without lattest updates and see if windows update would work (I'd do it if I'd knew how to..) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
AxlRose-RX
Joined: 11 Dec 2007
Posts: 6
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2007 8:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hi all first post here,
nice installer u got there, only thing the progress bar doesnt work for 3.0  , like ryans aio
I just finish my version, it installs 1.1 2, 3 and 3.5 with all updates and service packs, and I did my own custom progress bar that works, I also took all the crap for 64 so I just made it x86 and english only so that took lots of MBs out, going to do some more tests now, If you guys insterested I could upload.
since it is a quiet install it only shows a progress bar like this:
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
c400
Joined: 31 Jul 2006
Posts: 23
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2007 11:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
let`s what you`ve done
what`s the total size of your NET AiO ? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
keloo05
Joined: 26 Jun 2006
Posts: 212
Location: Romania, Timisoara
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2007 11:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm interested...Please upload when you finished it  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jd976
Joined: 21 Apr 2007
Posts: 61
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2007 11:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
| The second progress bar is from Microsofts own net 3.5 setup.exe using qb switch, which installs 2 sp1, 3 sp1, 3.5 with same bar. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Outbreaker
Joined: 21 Aug 2007
Posts: 464
|
| Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2007 10:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
AxlRose-RX all new addons are welcome.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dkrus
Joined: 21 Jun 2006
Posts: 372
|
| Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2007 11:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Outbreaker wrote: | | AxlRose-RX all new addons are welcome. |
I agree too |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
AxlRose-RX
Joined: 11 Dec 2007
Posts: 6
|
| Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2007 4:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hi, hmm yeah, I am having a lil problem
I can't get a good compres ratio, my installer gets from 152 MB to about 80, on a one gig ram pc I have, maybe I need more RAM, it should go way smaller in size
jd976s installer goes from 233 MB to 46.9, oviously I am doing something wrong, other than that my installer works perfect, even from svcpack, because i made a small c++ hack that doesnt break the webClient service, only thing is it has to be run at the end of svcpack.inf, first 35 then 1.1
I have tryed with 7zip and upx no less than 80
edit: also changed the progressbar to a simple .hta app, now u can custom it to your needs using simple html, and vb script. I am not uploading it to my server as big as it is right now |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
V@no
Joined: 28 Dec 2006
Posts: 17
|
| Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2007 9:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Can someone explain and/or give a hint how to fix this: using DotNetFx_All_In_1_Addon_v2.7z in nLite will not allow create new user in OOBE (OOBE starts, but user creation being skipped). User creation works fine when DotNetFx_All_In_1_Addon_v2.7z not used |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
AxlRose-RX
Joined: 11 Dec 2007
Posts: 6
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 25, 2007 5:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
have u tried using the net command to create users instead?
useraccounts.cmd
| Code: |
net user Admin /add
net localgroup Administrators Admin /add
net accounts /maxpwage:unlimited
exit
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
V@no
Joined: 28 Dec 2006
Posts: 17
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 25, 2007 5:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I have no issues create a new account once I logged on as administrator, the issue is that creating new user account supposed to be BEFORE you logon for the first time, basicaly you should endup with two admin accounts: Administrator (default) and Your_New_User you created in OOBE, the default administrator account will not be visible at logon screen. This issue also might be a problem if you have a registry tweaks that run as runonce, they will apply to the Administrator account. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
AxlRose-RX
Joined: 11 Dec 2007
Posts: 6
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 25, 2007 6:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I do this using cmdlines.txt under $OEM$ folder
| Code: |
[COMMANDS]
"useraccounts.cmd"
|
It runs at T-12 before first login, it does almost the same thing as OOBE, if you dont put a password u will login as the account created by the .cmd files and Administrator account won't be visible
I put my registry tweaks under cmd lines for hkcu and my reg tweaks for hklm under runonce at first login, in this case i have 2 reg files:
hkcu.reg under $OEM$ folder with useraccounts.cmd and cmdlines.txt:
| Code: |
[COMMANDS]
"REGEDIT /S hkcu.reg"
"useraccounts.cmd"
|
and hklm.reg under $OEM$\$1\Software that is run by a .cmd file at first login:
| Code: |
net user aspnet /delete
REGEDIT /S %systemdrive%\Software\hklm.reg
|
Last edited by AxlRose-RX on Tue Dec 25, 2007 6:09 pm |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
V@no
Joined: 28 Dec 2006
Posts: 17
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 25, 2007 6:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Well, its not what I'm after...I need create "custom" user before windows starts. For example when I test windows on virtual PC, I prefer create different user name then on host pc, with your method, I'll have to create two different CD for host and virtual... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
AxlRose-RX
Joined: 11 Dec 2007
Posts: 6
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 25, 2007 6:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I edit the post, and why do u need to create a diff user for a virtual pc than ur final cd? if u wanted to do that u could maybe edit the cmd file to check the computer name with an if statement, if it is a virtual pc prompt to create a dif user? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
V@no
Joined: 28 Dec 2006
Posts: 17
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 25, 2007 6:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
virtual pc was just an example, having more then one computer in household could be another example. Creating same username on different computers could cause some problems on the network (shares access).
Anyway, I'm trying find where is the problem, how to fix it and not work around it
Thanks for the ideas though |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jd976
Joined: 21 Apr 2007
Posts: 61
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 25, 2007 8:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| V@no wrote: | | Can someone explain and/or give a hint how to fix this: using DotNetFx_All_In_1_Addon_v2.7z in nLite will not allow create new user in OOBE (OOBE starts, but user creation being skipped). User creation works fine when DotNetFx_All_In_1_Addon_v2.7z not used |
I haven't seen this issue with my tests, during oobe useraccounts creation is displayed and accessible.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
V@no
Joined: 28 Dec 2006
Posts: 17
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 25, 2007 9:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| jd976 wrote: | | I haven't seen this issue with my tests, during oobe useraccounts creation is displayed and accessible. |
how did you use it?
I forgot to mention, I used as an update addon in nLite.
[EDIT]
just tested it without nlite and it indeed worked fine...
also, tryed integrate it with RVM integrator and then used nlite to complete the tweaks and OOBE skiped user creation...so, maybe someone can give a hint how to use nlite with this addon and OOBE user creation?
Thanks. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jd976
Joined: 21 Apr 2007
Posts: 61
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 25, 2007 11:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I tested it by using RyanVM Integrator 1.5 beta to integrate RVMUpdatePack2.1.11 and code65536's RUPUpdates-2.1.11.13 addon, then used nlite for various addons including DotNetFx_All_In_1_Addon_v2, and nothing else (no tweaks). I apply my tweaks with a custom inf file addon in nlite or Integrator, nlite during these tests. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nonno fabio
Joined: 06 Jun 2005
Posts: 1438
Location: Northern Italy
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 11:00 am Post subject: Re: [Release].Net Framework All in One x86 (incl 3.5) |
|
|
| jd976 wrote: |
...Includes .net 1.1 sp1, 2 sp1, 3 sp1, and 3.5 all patches applied... |
What KBs exactly have you applied?
Thanks for sharing this and for your reply.
_________________
Don't ask for a different configuration of Onepiece's XP AIO Update Pack: use one of the existing vanilla XP UpdatePack with your preferred addons instead
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cyberloner
Joined: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 315
Location: http://www.cybermania.ws
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 11:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
nice silent install....
tested and install all .net installer 1 2 3 3.5
please keep up @@
_________________
http://www.cybermania.ws |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jd976
Joined: 21 Apr 2007
Posts: 61
|
| Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 11:17 pm Post subject: Re: [Release].Net Framework All in One x86 (incl 3.5) |
|
|
| nonno fabio wrote: |
What KBs exactly have you applied?
|
Net framwork 1.1 + KB867460 + KB928366
and
Net framework 3.5 redistributable package.
Removed all non x86 parts from 3.5. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
stepmic
Joined: 11 Jan 2008
Posts: 2
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 5:16 am Post subject: Re: [Release].Net Framework All in One x86 (incl 3.5) |
|
|
| jd976 wrote: | | nonno fabio wrote: |
What KBs exactly have you applied?
|
Net framwork 1.1 + KB867460 + KB928366
and
Net framework 3.5 redistributable package.
Removed all non x86 parts from 3.5. |
After I use nlite to integate DotNetFx_All_In_1_Addon_v2.7z to windows xp, there has a problem.
The problem is that when I use windows update, it shows that it still has a hotfix for .NET 3.0 (KB932471) for me to install, but when i choose to install this hotfix, it shows that install fail, i try to reboot and install again but the problem still happen, so i want to know how to solve it?
Is that you haven't integate this hotfix into the DotNetFx_All_In_1_Addon_v2.7z???
Thankyou |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nonno fabio
Joined: 06 Jun 2005
Posts: 1438
Location: Northern Italy
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 6:34 am Post subject: Re: [Release].Net Framework All in One x86 (incl 3.5) |
|
|
| stepmic wrote: |
...The problem is that when I use windows update, it shows that it still has a hotfix for .NET 3.0 (KB932471) for me to install, but when i choose to install this hotfix, it shows that install fail, i try to reboot and install again but the problem still happen, so i want to know how to solve it?
Is that you haven't integate this hotfix into the DotNetFx_All_In_1_Addon_v2.7z???
|
| jd976 wrote: | ...
Note: Windows update may show that KB932471 is missing but fails to install. This is a mistake in Windows Update logic. Aaron Stebner's WebLog has a post related to this issue.
|
There's no need for KB932471 because 3.0 SP1 includes it.
Try this workaround: create a text file and paste this code (kindly submitted by Kontini)
| Code: | Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Updates\Windows Presentation Foundation\KB932471]
"Installed"=dword:00000001
"AppliedToSP"="R3"
"InstalledDate"="08/11/2007"
"InstallerVersion"="3.01"
"PublishingGroup"="Developer Division Customer Product-lifecycle Experience"
"Publisher"="Microsoft Corporation"
"PackageVersion"="1"
"PackageName"="Hotfix for Microsoft .NET Framework 3.0 (KB932471)"
"ReleaseType"="Hotfix"
"Type"="Update"
"InstalledBy"="kontini"
"Description"="This Hotfix is for Microsoft .NET Framework 3.0. \\n
If you later install a more recent service pack, this Hotfix will be uninstalled automatically. \\n
For more information, visit http://support.microsoft.com/kb/932471"
|
Save it as KB932471.reg and run it (or add code in your silent regtweaks for unattended installations): WU would ask for it no more
_________________
Don't ask for a different configuration of Onepiece's XP AIO Update Pack: use one of the existing vanilla XP UpdatePack with your preferred addons instead
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kontini
Joined: 18 Apr 2007
Posts: 71
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 3:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thnx jd976, great job.
I have a question: You know if is the WebClient issue solved?
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
HJW
XPu Master
Joined: 14 Jul 2006
Posts: 622
Location: University of Technology Delft, Netherlands
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 6:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| kontini wrote: | Thnx jd976, great job.
I have a question: You know if is the WebClient issue solved? |
I still got the WebClient issue with this addon, build one for myself with a regtweak. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Joffer
Joined: 03 Jul 2005
Posts: 19
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 10:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| The final v3.5 was released Jan 11th 2008... Does this package have the final version integrated or is it a beta/rc? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
stepmic
Joined: 11 Jan 2008
Posts: 2
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 11:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Joffer wrote: | | The final v3.5 was released Jan 11th 2008... Does this package have the final version integrated or is it a beta/rc? |
I also notice that microsoft has release .Net Framework 3.5 Final. I think that this version hasn't integate the final version of the .Net Framework 3.5. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jd976
Joined: 21 Apr 2007
Posts: 61
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 4:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
KB932471 doesn't show up with rc sp3, so I won't change the installers.
| kontini wrote: | | I have a question: You know if is the WebClient issue solved? |
I never had the webclient issue. The svcpack compatible addon does have a regtweak that should prevent it.
| HJW wrote: | | I still got the WebClient issue with this addon, build one for myself with a regtweak. |
Whats the tweak?
| Joffer wrote: | | The final v3.5 was released Jan 11th 2008... Does this package have the final version integrated or is it a beta/rc? |
Its the final version of 3.5.
This page only updated the express installer on 1/11/2008. The redistributable package has the same md5 as the one released in late November. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
bober101
Joined: 08 Feb 2007
Posts: 923
Location: canadia!
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 9:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
lol alot of "judas" exsists....
_________________
XP theme source patcher
patches/overwrites ure default xp visual resources |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
larciel
Joined: 21 Dec 2004
Posts: 216
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 10:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I don't know how you managed to slim them but thank you ! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cyberloner
Joined: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 315
Location: http://www.cybermania.ws
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2008 10:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
may i ask why Windows Imaging Component is included?
_________________
http://www.cybermania.ws |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jd976
Joined: 21 Apr 2007
Posts: 61
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2008 3:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| cyberloner wrote: | | may i ask why Windows Imaging Component is included? |
Its included with net 3.5 setup. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ccl0
Joined: 02 Jan 2007
Posts: 815
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 4:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i have a question about this which hopefully someone would be able to answer for me.
my windows cd already has a 39mb folder named DOTNETFX, which from what i understand contains dot net 1.1
i would like to use this 3.5 all in one here, but i'm wondering what i should do with this DOTNETFX folder..
should i delete it? should i leave it alone? is there any pros or cons to keeping it or removing it? if anyone has some suggestions/opinions please let me know
thanks |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jd976
Joined: 21 Apr 2007
Posts: 61
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 9:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | As of Windows XP SP2, an extra folder known as cmpnents is added, with Tablet PC and .NET Framework 1.0 components which is also considered safe to delete (This folder may also contain Media Center components, which I'm unsure of as I don't personally use MCE).
|
From this page. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ccl0
Joined: 02 Jan 2007
Posts: 815
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 10:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| thanks just wanted to make sure it was safe before i removed it |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Botus
Joined: 22 Dec 2007
Posts: 153
Location: UK
|
| Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 1:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi Guys, I downlaoded this dotnetfxAIO.exe thinking I read it was to install on any machine running XP (now I can't see where I read that bit) double clicked to run and got a message can't install already running an older version (it is has 1 2 and 3) dissapointed I clicked OK and walked away from PC came back a few mins later to see it was installing ?
Seems to have install correctly shows up at having 1 2 3.5 and sp packs
Test PC was XP Pro with SP3 (3264) installed |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cybpsych
Joined: 12 Jan 2005
Posts: 391
|
| Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 7:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| XP Pro SP3????!!!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cyberloner
Joined: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 315
Location: http://www.cybermania.ws
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 7:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
hope to see this installer is keep up ...and updated... =)
by the way..
can u make a version without .net beta 3.5? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jd976
Joined: 21 Apr 2007
Posts: 61
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2008 10:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| These contain final of 3.5. Not beta. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Alyrian
Joined: 02 Mar 2008
Posts: 5
Location: London, UK
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 03, 2008 11:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
Installed perfectly in VirtualBox and Real install.
All appear to be installed correctly within Control Panel
But it is showing 3.0 SP1 KB929300 in windows update stating it should be 25.9 mb but in fact it only dl 0.9 mb, then no further problem.
Cheers |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
John Galt
Joined: 08 Jul 2007
Posts: 21
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2008 9:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
Just curious
Post says 49mb, downloaded file is 47.5
have you updated or am i having brain f__t |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jd976
Joined: 21 Apr 2007
Posts: 61
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2008 10:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
| John Galt wrote: | Just curious
Post says 49mb, downloaded file is 47.5
have you updated or am i having brain f__t |
No update. Just used approximate size that rapidshare quoted after upload. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
