| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
5eraph
Moderator
Joined: 05 Jul 2005
Posts: 3694
Location: Riverview, MI USA
|
 Posted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 6:44 am Post subject: Addons/Tools List for XP/2003 x64 |
 |
|
This thread is meant to serve as a place to post links to addons and tools for use with Windows XP/2003 x64. I guess I'll start with the few I know about.
Last edited by 5eraph on Sat Jun 25, 2011 5:51 pm |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HJW
XPu Master
Joined: 14 Jul 2006
Posts: 622
Location: University of Technology Delft, Netherlands
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 8:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
.NET Framework ENU-x64
MD5 =
version=2.1
compressed= 65,9mb
extracted= 442mb
.NET 2.0 Service Pack 2
with NDP20SP2-KB958481-x64
.NET 3.0 Service Pack 2
with NDP30SP2-KB958483-x64
.NET 3.5 Service Pack 1
with NDP35SP1-KB953595-x64
with NDP35SP1-KB958484-x64
MSXML6 _64bit
kb961118-x64-enu (ntprint.cat)
Changelog:
v2.1
- Added ngen command for processing queue
- Fixed registery entries
v2.0
- Updated to 4th June 2009
v1.4
- fixed some issues
- added 3.5 sp1 again
v1.3
- Updated to SP2
- Removed 3.5 SP1 incompability issues.
v1.2
- Updated MSXML6 to SP1
- Updated NET20 to SP2
- Updated NET30 to SP2
- Updated NET35 to SP1
v1.1
- Fixed MSXML6 installation
Notes:
-All dialog boxes are set to passive. During the .NET Framework installation you will see only progressbars and archive extraction dialog.
-Recommended not to install @T-13
-IF Add/Remove Panel states .NET Framework 3.5 SP1 instead of .NET Framework 3.5 Service Pack 1 the registry values have not been applied and .NET package shows up at MU.
Powershell ENU-x64
Will show up at MU after installing .Net Framework 30sp2 and 35sp1. Use this switchless installer to install Powershell v2 and MUIpack.
Notes:
-Not to install before .NET framework
Notes:
DirectX Redist March 09 x64 switchless installer
MD5 =
version=march09
compressed= 52,9mb
Notes:
- Repacked with only x64 components.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Vista Bootscreen x64 Addon
ntoskrnl.exe and ntmpkrna.exe
Notes:
LogonUI Xpize Dark x64
logonui.exe
Notes:
- LogonUI as used in Xpize Dark / Black Edition
Last edited by HJW on Wed Jun 03, 2009 7:27 pm |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
RickSteele
Joined: 02 Oct 2006
Posts: 288
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 4:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
Check out here, I thought I would just post the link rather than double post; as explained these are not addons, but, work very well in 64-bit.
http://www.ryanvm.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=4737
last post....
Also, a while back I became very frustrated with IE7's HTML shortcut/document etc. icons reverting to unknown file type icon, or after installing Office 2003 all the IE specific document icons reverting to unknown file type icon. After a Google search many times, I came across this:
| Code: |
' VBScript sample using Windows Script Host
'
Set WshShell = WScript.CreateObject("WScript.Shell")
WshShell.RegWrite "HKCR\.htm\", "htmlfile", "REG_SZ"
WshShell.RegWrite "HKCR\.html\", "htmlfile", "REG_SZ"
WshShell.RegWrite "HKCR\.mht\", "mhtmlfile", "REG_SZ"
WshShell.RegWrite "HKCR\.mhtml\", "mhtmlfile", "REG_SZ"
WshShell.RegWrite "HKCR\htmlfile\DefaultIcon\", "%Programfiles%\Internet Explorer\IEXPLORE.EXE,1", "REG_EXPAND_SZ"
WshShell.RegWrite "HKCR\mhtmlfile\DefaultIcon\", "%Programfiles%\Internet Explorer\IEXPLORE.EXE,22", "REG_EXPAND_SZ"
WshShell.Regdelete "HKCR\htmlfile\ShellEx\IconHandler\"
WshShell.Regdelete "HKCR\mhtmlfile\ShellEx\IconHandler\"
WshShell.RegWrite "HKLM\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\App Paths\IEXPLORE.EXE\", "%Programfiles%\Internet Explorer\IEXPLORE.EXE", "REG_EXPAND_SZ"
Wshshell.RUN ("regsvr32.exe mshtml.dll -i -s")
Wshshell.RUN ("regsvr32.exe shdocvw.dll -i -s")
|
a vbs that restores the icons quite nicely; works beautifully in 64-bit.
I cannot seem to find the author's name, so, if anyone does please post it so that person may get proper credit/praise. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ENU_user
Joined: 25 Jan 2006
Posts: 1247
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
RickSteele
Joined: 02 Oct 2006
Posts: 288
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
|
| Posted: Sat Aug 02, 2008 6:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
HJW
The .Net Framework NLD All-In-One x64 Addon and the DirectX Redist June 08 x64 Addon work fantastically; the errors recorded in the system logs are, as you say, harmless; affecting nothing.
Realtime install, along with 5eraph's excellent update pack.
Thanks very much |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
code65536
Joined: 14 Mar 2007
Posts: 735
Location: .us
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
HJW
XPu Master
Joined: 14 Jul 2006
Posts: 622
Location: University of Technology Delft, Netherlands
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 1:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| code65536 wrote: | DirectX switchless installers for x64 (note that you actually need both the 32-bit and 64-bit runtimes for Windows x64)
|
On what data is that stated? I mean how do you know that ? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
code65536
Joined: 14 Mar 2007
Posts: 735
Location: .us
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 1:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| HJW wrote: | | On what data is that stated? I mean how do you know that ? |
Well, it makes sense if you think about it. 32-bit and 64-bit are not binary compatible, so 32-bit apps can't load 64-bit DLLs and vice-versa. If you are running a 32-bit game, it's going to need 32-bit runtimes, regardless of whether the OS is 32-bit or 64-bit. It's the same reason x64 Windows installs two copies of every system library, a 64-bit version in system32 and a 32-bit version in syswow64.
Also, if you run Microsoft's official web installer in Vista x64, it will install both the 32-bit and 64-bit libraries.
_________________
My addons: CmdOpen - HashCheck - Notepad2 - MS Runtimes - DirectX
Into the breach, meatbags! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
HJW
XPu Master
Joined: 14 Jul 2006
Posts: 622
Location: University of Technology Delft, Netherlands
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 6:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| code65536 wrote: | | HJW wrote: | | On what data is that stated? I mean how do you know that ? |
Well, it makes sense if you think about it. 32-bit and 64-bit are not binary compatible, so 32-bit apps can't load 64-bit DLLs and vice-versa. If you are running a 32-bit game, it's going to need 32-bit runtimes, regardless of whether the OS is 32-bit or 64-bit. It's the same reason x64 Windows installs two copies of every system library, a 64-bit version in system32 and a 32-bit version in syswow64.
Also, if you run Microsoft's official web installer in Vista x64, it will install both the 32-bit and 64-bit libraries. |
Yeah, guess you're right. My slimmed down installer does not install everything then. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
RickSteele
Joined: 02 Oct 2006
Posts: 288
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2008 5:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
@HJW
I get a 404 error when trying to download your .Net Framework NLD All-In-One x64 Addon; all else downloads without error.
Could it be that the file name is incorrect on the server?
ie: Framework-Addon-NLD-aio_v2.2.7z should read Framework-Addon-NLD-aio_v1.2.7z
....actually the MD5 Hash for Framework-Addon-NLD-aio_v2.2.7z does not match with that which you posted.
thanks |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
HJW
XPu Master
Joined: 14 Jul 2006
Posts: 622
Location: University of Technology Delft, Netherlands
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2008 5:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
| RickSteele wrote: | @HJW
I get a 404 error when trying to download your .Net Framework NLD All-In-One x64 Addon; all else downloads without error.
Could it be that the file name is incorrect on the server?
ie: Framework-Addon-NLD-aio_v2.2.7z should read Framework-Addon-NLD-aio_v1.2.7z
....actually the MD5 Hash for Framework-Addon-NLD-aio_v2.2.7z does not match with that which you posted.
thanks |
v2.2 is the Dutch addon i manage in the Dutch section. 32bits only.
64bits addon is currently not available (will upload soon again) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
RickSteele
Joined: 02 Oct 2006
Posts: 288
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2008 6:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks very much HJW, looking forward to it-very excellent addon.
I will test 1.3 this weekend and report back. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
HJW
XPu Master
Joined: 14 Jul 2006
Posts: 622
Location: University of Technology Delft, Netherlands
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2008 5:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| RickSteele wrote: | Thanks very much HJW, looking forward to it-very excellent addon.
I will test 1.3 this weekend and report back. |
Please notice 1.3 is taken offline due fatal errors
sorry for the inconvenience. I recommend not to test 1.3  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
RickSteele
Joined: 02 Oct 2006
Posts: 288
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2008 6:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Absofreakin'lootly no inconvenience whatsoever; thanks very much for the headsup and all the hard work.
I'll wait, then, until you feel it is ready-no problem'o  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
HJW
XPu Master
Joined: 14 Jul 2006
Posts: 622
Location: University of Technology Delft, Netherlands
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 11:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
| got everyhting up and runnin pretty good. updated to 1.4 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
RickSteele
Joined: 02 Oct 2006
Posts: 288
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 14, 2008 3:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
| .NET Framework Addon ENU-x64_v1.4 works very well-fresh, realtime install and IE 8 B2 slipstreamed via nlite. Thanks HJW! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
oao
Joined: 05 Aug 2008
Posts: 49
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 3:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Does the NET Frame add-on work as is with Integrator? Does it work with nLite? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
oao
Joined: 05 Aug 2008
Posts: 49
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 3:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| By which I mean just add it as is to either program, without any other action/modification/configuration etc. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
RickSteele
Joined: 02 Oct 2006
Posts: 288
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 31, 2008 7:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Does the NET Frame add-on work as is with Integrator?
Yes
Does it work with nLite?
Yes
.......both as is-the addon |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
oao
Joined: 05 Aug 2008
Posts: 49
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 01, 2008 12:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
| If, as I understand from this thread, nLite keeps the order, then I can apply all of them in one session. In what category do add-ons fall? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
5eraph
Moderator
Joined: 05 Jul 2005
Posts: 3694
Location: Riverview, MI USA
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 01, 2008 2:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Apply addons under Hotfixes. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
crashfly
Joined: 13 Mar 2008
Posts: 788
Location: Arkansas, USA
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 11, 2009 1:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quite a bit late, but there appears to be an error with the netfx_x64.exe. In looking "inside" of it, there appears to be a problem with the .net 3.5 installer.
Listed inside the "netfx35sp1x64" directory, there is an installer "vs_setup.msi", where as the 'install.cmd" file calls "netfx35sp1x64\NetFx30a_x64.msi".
I am thinking this is either labeled wrong, or it is just an error. Hopefully the "powers that be" can fix it. 
_________________
A mind is like a parachute, it only functions when it is open.
--Anonymous
How to Ask Questions the Smart Way |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
crashfly
Joined: 13 Mar 2008
Posts: 788
Location: Arkansas, USA
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 11, 2009 2:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
In looking a bit closer, appearantly the "Addon" was updated properly, but the download for the switchless installer was not. The switchless installer is the one with the error. Just an FYI for everyone until it is fixed.
_________________
A mind is like a parachute, it only functions when it is open.
--Anonymous
How to Ask Questions the Smart Way |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Passion
Joined: 11 Jan 2009
Posts: 105
Location: Meow Bay
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 12, 2009 6:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
@HJW;
I tried this for a Windows XP x64 Edition SP2 iso, but it gives me errors each time. I already tried many different orders of creating the install-iso, but the .net x64 Addon always seems to cause problems. The error is during setup at
"Performing final tasks"
at which point I see a red cross error Window called netfx35sp1x64\NetFx30a_x64.msi saying:
Windows cannot find 'netfx35sp1x64\NetFx30a_x64.msi'. Make sure you typed the name correctly, and then try again. To search for a file, click the start button, and then click Search.
This holds install waiting for an [ OK ].
By the way, afterwards it does seem that the x64 .NET Framework is installed though, but I haven't tested that very much yet. I just need an unattended installer iso.
Any ideas what might cause the error? At what stage do I best add the netfx64 addon? See also here.
Thanks in advance!
_________________
| http://totalcmd.net/ | http://appdb.winehq.org/ | http://thezeitgeistmovement.com/ | http://doorbraak.eu/ | |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
crashfly
Joined: 13 Mar 2008
Posts: 788
Location: Arkansas, USA
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 12, 2009 8:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
If you will read above, I would suggest downloading the addon and exacting the .net x64 installer from it. It would seem *that* installer was fixed, where as the stand alone installer appears to be the one with the error.
As for install locations, I use the installer as the very last thing in svcpack.inf and it appears to install without a problem. However, if you are concerned, it should also install from RunOnceEx as well.
_________________
A mind is like a parachute, it only functions when it is open.
--Anonymous
How to Ask Questions the Smart Way |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Passion
Joined: 11 Jan 2009
Posts: 105
Location: Meow Bay
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
crashfly
Joined: 13 Mar 2008
Posts: 788
Location: Arkansas, USA
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 27, 2009 10:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Anyone feel like tackling the new cumulative update for .net framework on x64 (KB951847)? It actually needs to be downloaded from the Microsoft Update Catalog site, but the downloads for x86-64 appear to be so "honking" big (well over 200mb).
I am hoping someone would like to work on that update. Otherwise, this is just a notification that an update is needed.
_________________
A mind is like a parachute, it only functions when it is open.
--Anonymous
How to Ask Questions the Smart Way |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Passion
Joined: 11 Jan 2009
Posts: 105
Location: Meow Bay
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
crashfly
Joined: 13 Mar 2008
Posts: 788
Location: Arkansas, USA
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 30, 2009 1:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think this is either a "new" update or probably more like a "re-update". I have used the installer above and it still wanted me to update .net framework. Actually, both the 32 bit *and* 64 bit XPs with .net wanted an update.
_________________
A mind is like a parachute, it only functions when it is open.
--Anonymous
How to Ask Questions the Smart Way |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Passion
Joined: 11 Jan 2009
Posts: 105
Location: Meow Bay
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 05, 2009 10:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
| crashfly wrote: | | I think this is either a "new" update or probably more like a "re-update". I have used the installer above and it still wanted me to update .net framework. Actually, both the 32 bit *and* 64 bit XPs with .net wanted an update. |
Yes, I saw that too. Really don't know what's going on here. The KB number is really old, so they should at least include a V2 in it or something.
Anyway, does anyone care to create a 3 in one package (minus the .NET 1.1 nobody uses) for XP x64 ?
_________________
| http://totalcmd.net/ | http://appdb.winehq.org/ | http://thezeitgeistmovement.com/ | http://doorbraak.eu/ | |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
HJW
XPu Master
Joined: 14 Jul 2006
Posts: 622
Location: University of Technology Delft, Netherlands
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 13, 2009 3:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Passion wrote: | | crashfly wrote: | | I think this is either a "new" update or probably more like a "re-update". I have used the installer above and it still wanted me to update .net framework. Actually, both the 32 bit *and* 64 bit XPs with .net wanted an update. |
Yes, I saw that too. Really don't know what's going on here. The KB number is really old, so they should at least include a V2 in it or something.
Anyway, does anyone care to create a 3 in one package (minus the .NET 1.1 nobody uses) for XP x64 ? |
wokring on it atm |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Passion
Joined: 11 Jan 2009
Posts: 105
Location: Meow Bay
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Passion
Joined: 11 Jan 2009
Posts: 105
Location: Meow Bay
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
HJW
XPu Master
Joined: 14 Jul 2006
Posts: 622
Location: University of Technology Delft, Netherlands
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
RickSteele
Joined: 02 Oct 2006
Posts: 288
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 8:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Oh yaaaaa!; awesome, I will test the minute, the miilisecond, it comes out. Thanks HJW! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
HJW
XPu Master
Joined: 14 Jul 2006
Posts: 622
Location: University of Technology Delft, Netherlands
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 17, 2009 3:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
| RickSteele wrote: | | Oh yaaaaa!; awesome, I will test the minute, the miilisecond, it comes out. Thanks HJW! |
Dont forget to test @T13 also, thanks in advance. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
HJW
XPu Master
Joined: 14 Jul 2006
Posts: 622
Location: University of Technology Delft, Netherlands
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 17, 2009 3:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Passion wrote: | | This one does not work as an addon. In fact, when I added it, it ended up halting the install with a sitting duck (litterally).. waiting for a password that would not yield anything. |
This may indicate the addon is using old file version of logonui. I will look into it when I have some spare time. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Passion
Joined: 11 Jan 2009
Posts: 105
Location: Meow Bay
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 17, 2009 6:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
Brilliant. Works as advertised. Thank you very much for this. Timing is great too. Just needed to roll out an image. I tried it post install, using a RunOnce pull from a cmd file. By the way, note that it installs two quite heavy resource-hungry services, and sets them on automatic. Most will prefer the Manual setting, so if you could incorporate this, it would be nice:
| Code: | [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\clr_optimization_v2.0.50727_32]
"Start"=dword:00000003
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\clr_optimization_v2.0.50727_64]
"Start"=dword:00000003 |
This needs to be done post-install of your .NET installer.
_________________
| http://totalcmd.net/ | http://appdb.winehq.org/ | http://thezeitgeistmovement.com/ | http://doorbraak.eu/ | |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
HJW
XPu Master
Joined: 14 Jul 2006
Posts: 622
Location: University of Technology Delft, Netherlands
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 17, 2009 11:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Is it recommended to turn those services off to manual setting? I mean, what does it do and is it neccessary?
Secondly, is this applicable for x86 framework too?
thanks, |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Passion
Joined: 11 Jan 2009
Posts: 105
Location: Meow Bay
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2009 6:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| HJW wrote: | Is it recommended to turn those services off to manual setting? I mean, what does it do and is it neccessary?
Secondly, is this applicable for x86 framework too? |
I think it is, haven't tested it on x86.
If it is set to Manual, .NET will start the service when it is required by software using the framework files, so it is kind of useless having it running all the time.
_________________
| http://totalcmd.net/ | http://appdb.winehq.org/ | http://thezeitgeistmovement.com/ | http://doorbraak.eu/ | |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
HJW
XPu Master
Joined: 14 Jul 2006
Posts: 622
Location: University of Technology Delft, Netherlands
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 1:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Passion wrote: | | HJW wrote: | Is it recommended to turn those services off to manual setting? I mean, what does it do and is it neccessary?
Secondly, is this applicable for x86 framework too? |
I think it is, haven't tested it on x86.
If it is set to Manual, .NET will start the service when it is required by software using the framework files, so it is kind of useless having it running all the time. |
They won't , on my x64 and x86 install after reboot they are set to (3) already, so no need for regtweaks i guess? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Passion
Joined: 11 Jan 2009
Posts: 105
Location: Meow Bay
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
RickSteele
Joined: 02 Oct 2006
Posts: 288
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 24, 2009 6:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
@HJW
...at T13 x64_v2.exe installs, but, system log shows all VC80 sidebyside installations to have failed-a very long list in the log; M$ update shows the entire DotNET 3.5 SP 1 and 3.5 Family Update (KB951847) x64 as required.
Looking in %systemroot% the DotNet's all seem to be installed; any programs requiring them all run perfectly, of course there is the usual "get fontcache failed" etc.
The setup error log in %systemroot% is 0KB and no errors are recorded during Windows installation.
This is a very plain jane install; 5eraph's update pack, tweaks etc. with nlite and Boooggy's WMP11 slipstreamer; x64_v2.exe manually inserted in svcpack.
A little fine tuning perhaps, but, absolutely beautiful HJW; will test any updated installer at T13.
Thanks very much. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
HJW
XPu Master
Joined: 14 Jul 2006
Posts: 622
Location: University of Technology Delft, Netherlands
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 24, 2009 12:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| RickSteele wrote: | @HJW
...at T13 x64_v2.exe installs, but, system log shows all VC80 sidebyside installations to have failed-a very long list in the log; M$ update shows the entire DotNET 3.5 SP 1 and 3.5 Family Update (KB951847) x64 as required.
Looking in %systemroot% the DotNet's all seem to be installed; any programs requiring them all run perfectly, of course there is the usual "get fontcache failed" etc.
The setup error log in %systemroot% is 0KB and no errors are recorded during Windows installation.
This is a very plain jane install; 5eraph's update pack, tweaks etc. with nlite and Boooggy's WMP11 slipstreamer; x64_v2.exe manually inserted in svcpack.
A little fine tuning perhaps, but, absolutely beautiful HJW; will test any updated installer at T13.
Thanks very much. |
I would recommend to use it only after setup since T13 fails. I will not do any efforts to make it working properly at T13. However if someone has solution for it, let me know. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
RickSteele
Joined: 02 Oct 2006
Posts: 288
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 24, 2009 12:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| No problemo' will do; thanks again! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Raoul90
Joined: 17 Jan 2008
Posts: 675
Location: The Netherlands
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
5eraph
Moderator
Joined: 05 Jul 2005
Posts: 3694
Location: Riverview, MI USA
|
| Posted: Sat Apr 04, 2009 7:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
Somehow I missed your post, Raoul90. I'm sorry about that.
IE7 can be directly integrated by nLite 1.4.9.1. Just add it as a hotfix.
WMP11 for x64 must be slipstreamed using boooggy's tool. YumeYao's addon is for x86 only.
Before I migrated my home PCs to XP x64 when SP2 was released I was an active contributor to the DriverPacks project, but I haven't kept up with DriverPack development over the past few years. I haven't tried any of the current DriverPacks. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
HJW
XPu Master
Joined: 14 Jul 2006
Posts: 622
Location: University of Technology Delft, Netherlands
|
| Posted: Tue May 26, 2009 8:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
.NET Framework ENU-x64
MD5 =
version=2.1
compressed= 64,9mb
extracted= 442mb
.NET 2.0 Service Pack 2
with NDP20SP2-KB958481-x64
.NET 3.0 Service Pack 2
with NDP30SP2-KB958483-x64
.NET 3.5 Service Pack 1
with NDP35SP1-KB958484-x64
MSXML6 _64bit
kb961118-x64-enu (ntprint.cat)
Notes:
-All dialog boxes are set to passive. During the .NET Framework installation you will see only progressbars and archive extraction dialog.
-Recommended not to install @T-13
-IF Add/Remove Panel states .NET Framework 3.5 SP1 instead of .NET Framework 3.5 Service Pack 1 the registry values have not been applied and .NET package shows up at MU.
Powershell ENU-x64
Will show up at MU after installing .Net Framework 30sp2 and 35sp1. Use this switchless installer to install Powershell v2 and MUIpack.
Notes:
-Not to install before .NET framework
Last edited by HJW on Wed Jun 03, 2009 7:16 pm |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
trippinferret
Joined: 31 Jul 2008
Posts: 58
Location: Lakewood, N.S.W. Australia
|
| Posted: Tue May 26, 2009 8:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi HJW
Just tried your Net Framework ENU 64 on a 5eraph updated XP X64 and it worked perfect "good job"
Thanks |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
HJW
XPu Master
Joined: 14 Jul 2006
Posts: 622
Location: University of Technology Delft, Netherlands
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 7:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
For some reason the lasts commands in install.cmd are not processed.
REGEDIT /S UpdateARP_x64.reg
REG DELETE "HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall\KB954550-v7" /F
REG DELETE "HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall\WIC" /F
REG DELETE "HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall\KB961118" /F
@trippinferret Sure .NET does not show up @mu? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
